Iowa primary precinct caucus and caucuses news">

Iowa primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

IOWA DAILY REPORT

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Our Mission: to hold the Democrat presidential candidates accountable for their comments and allegations against President George W. Bush, to make citizens aware of false statements or claims by the Democrat candidates, and to defend the Bush Administration and set the record straight when the Democrats make false or misleading statements about the Bush-Republican record.

General News

Candidates & Caucuses

Clinton Comedies

Iowa/National Politics

Morning Summary

War & Terrorism

Federal Issues

Iowa Issues

Opinions 

Iowa Sports

Iowa Weather 

Iowaisms

 Today's Cartoon

The Bush Beat

 Cartoon Archive

PAGE 1                                                                                                              Thursday, September 11, 2003


DEM
CANDIDATES

“In previous appearances together, the candidates have looked more like a ragtag team of underdogs hankering to make the big leagues and take on President Bush…Not so Tuesday night at a debate sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus.” AP’s Nedra Pickler


“Aides to Carol Moseley Braun, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and Al Sharpton said they were unsure what the candidates planned to do.” Excerpt from AP report on how Dem wannabes would observe 9/11 anniversary, although it sounds a lot like their normal uncertain scheduling routine.   

EDWARDS

“I think what Howard Dean said last night does a disservice to everyone he stood next to and all the people before us who have raised this issue over and over again in front of all audiences.” Edwards, countering Dean’s claim that he’s the “only white politician” discussing race in front of white audiences

DEAN

 “While his statement was likely intended to reference Iowa's relatively small minority population, it still reflected a cavalier attitude toward recruiting much-needed minority support to his campaign.” Daily Iowan (University of Iowa) editorial, commenting on absence of minority supporters in Dean’s campaign


I think they're concerned about his overwhelmingly white support.” Gephardt campaign chief of staff Steve Elmendorf commenting on Dean

KERRY

“I'm not going to disarm.” – Kerry, commenting on decision to exceed spending caps if Dean does


“He can't just say he was changing his position for political reasons, so he is making the logically untenable claim that he's been consistent all along. Thus when asked to explain his thinking on the most important issue of the day, the haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat, who by the way served in Vietnam, is reduced to incoherent blather.James Taranto in yesterday’s “Best of the Web Today” column, commenting on Kerry’s latest explanation of his Iraq vote

GEPHARDT

“Unfortunately for us reporters, neither of these meetings is expected to yield major news -- at least not today. Which may not be bad news for GephardtJohn Mercurio of CNN Political Unit, commenting on two key groups Gephardt was scheduled to meet with in DC yesterday

LIEBERMAN

“I won't tie my tongue, nor should any American tie his tongue, because our Secretary of Defense thinks dissent encourages the terrorists.” Lieberman

PATRIOT’S DAY.

Time for Americans to remember and reflect on the terrorist attacks as most Dem wannabes are putting campaigns on hold for the day. The next big campaign event will be Saturday at annual Harkin steak fry in Iowa. At least six wannabes are scheduled to attend the Harkin event – which features Bill Clinton as the main speaker.  


GENERAL NEWS:  Among the offerings in today's update:

  • Zogby poll: Dean leads in Iowa – tops Gephardt 23%-17% – with Kerry at 11%, Edwards 6%. Lieberman (4%) and others in campaign trail dust. That means Zogby shows Dean leading in both IA and NH

  • Dean invites prospective wannabe Clark to join his campaign effort

  • Boston Globe this morning: Kerry to break spending cap, open piggy bank for campaign if Dean goes beyond federal limit

  • Edwards joins anti-Dean Wannabe tag team, goes after the alleged frontrunner for race comments during Baltimore debate

  • Lieberman says it’s past time for Iraq administrator Bremer to surrender control to an international administrator

  • New York Post blasts Hillary’s latest political antics, questions why GOP is giving her a “free ride”

  • Daily Iowan (University of Iowa) editorial says Dean should realize the “fault lies in the messenger, not the audience” for failing to attract black and minority supporters

  • Best of Web’s Taranto writes that Kerry has “sunk into a verbal quagmire”

  • American Muslim poll: Only 2% say they’d vote for GWB, Dean (26%) favored among Dems – followed by Kucinich, Kerry and Moseley Braun

  • Dean – already under fire from Daily Iowan, Kerry, Lieberman, Edwards and other wannabes – gets criticized by House Democrats for his Israel remarks. Gephardt and Kerry supporters sign letter drilling Dean

  • Iowa: Quad-City Times reported today that IA Sen President Kramer likely to be gone – and become an ambassador – before next legislative session

  • Analysis: AP’s Fournier says Lieberman takes risk by challenging Dean

  • Critical meetings on Gephardt’s future yesterday, but unfortunately there won’t be any immediate news reports about them

  • Kucinich’s flip-flop on abortion continues to follow him on the campaign trail – and will again back home when he’s done playing wannabe games

  • LA Times: California decision to license illegal residents could result in new border-crossing procedures

  • Edwards, renowned son of a millworker, will announce his candidacy next week in from of – where else? – a closed textile mill

  • Iowaism: Eighty-one IA communities took part in tree-planting program last year

All these stories below and more.


Morning reports:

One word – rain – dominates morning newscasts as residents in most sections of Iowa await relief from dry, drought conditions. The NW part of the state has been receiving rain for the past several hours with minor street flooding reported in Sioux City and some field flooding in the surrounding area. Reports indicate that some communities in the northwest counties have received about three inches of precipitation. Heavy rain was reported in Sioux City this morning. The storms are expected to move across the state today – although in Jasper County (Newton) officials have imposed a county-wide open burning ban.

 CANDIDATES & CAUCUSES

… “Dean asks Clark to join campaign” – headline from this morning’s The Union Leader. Coverage – excerpt – by AP’s Ron Fournier: “Democrat Howard Dean has asked retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark to support his presidential campaign if Clark decides not to enter the race. The pair met in California on Saturday to discuss the presidential race that Clark is expected to enter as early as next week, becoming the 10th Democratic candidate. Dean, the current front-runner, asked Clark for his support on the outside chance that Clark doesn't seek the presidency on his own. ‘They've gotten together several times,’ said Joe Trippi, Dean's campaign manager. ‘They talk about a lot of issues. Every time the governor talks to him he asks for Clark's support. I don't think there's any news in that. I hope every Democrat is asking for support.’ Trippi and Clark's top political adviser, Mark Nichols, talk frequently about the race. Officials familiar with the conversation say neither Trippi nor Dean have asked Clark or his advisers to stay out of the race. News of the meeting, first reported by The Washington Post, raised questions about whether Dean was trying to strike an alliance with Clark early in the nomination fight, perhaps promising him a spot on the presidential ticket should Dean be nominated. Officials close to Dean said there is no such agreement in the works. The meeting took place on the sidelines of Dean's public embrace of California Gov. Gray Davis, who is fending off a recall effort. Clark, a former NATO commander, has never run for political office. Other candidates have also courted Clark, including Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, who spoke to the retired general in the past couple of weeks seeking his support. Dean's advisers, recognizing that the former Vermont governor's lack of foreign policy experience could be a liability, have long been intrigued by the idea of drawing the retired general into Dean's inner circle. Both Dean and Clark opposed the war in Iraq, and both are producing excitement on the Internet with grass-roots activists. Still, Dean's advisers hold out little hope that Clark will do anything other than seek the presidency himself.”

Edwards (6%) separates from second tier candidates as Dean (23%) shows six-point lead over Gephardt (17%) with Kerry (11%) in Zogby Iowa survey. Lieberman at 4%, others in the 2% range.  Excerpt from report by AP’s Will Lester: “Howard Dean has taken a slight lead over Dick Gephardt in a poll of those likely to attend the Iowa Democratic caucuses, giving the former Vermont governor an advantage in the two states with the first presidential contests this January. Dean was at 23 percent; Gephardt, a Missouri congressman, 17 percent; and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, 11 percent, in the Iowa poll conducted by Zogby International. A third, 32 percent, were undecided and all other candidates were in single digits. In New Hampshire, which holds its primary a week after the Jan. 19 Iowa caucuses, Dean holds a 12-point lead over KerryIn the Iowa poll, 6 percent of those likely to attend the caucuses chose North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, 4 percent Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman and 2 percent Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich. Florida Sen. Bob Graham, Carol Moseley Braun and retired Gen. Wesley Clark had 1 percent. Clark is expected to decide soon whether he will enter the race. In a Zogby Iowa poll in April, Gephardt was at 25 percent and Kerry was at 13 percent. Dean was at 6 percent in that poll. Gephardt and Dean were tied in a Research 2000 poll taken in late August. Polling in Iowa is traditionally difficult because it is hard for pollsters to identify the relatively small number of activists who will participate in the caucuses. The poll of 500 likely caucus-goers was taken Sept. 8-9 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.”

Wannabes lower profile for 9/11 observance. Headline from this morning’s Union Leader: “Most Democrats off trail on attacks anniversary Excerpt from Associated Press report: “Most of the Democratic presidential candidates are putting their campaigns on hold for the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, choosing to take part in memorial services or simply staying out of the public spotlight for the day. The lone exception was Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, who planned to address the Council on Foreign Relations in New York Thursday. The subject of his remarks: the war on terror two years after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts planned to attend a memorial service in Boston Thursday, then help prepare meals at a veterans' homeless shelter. ‘The families of 9-11 have asked that Sept. 11 be a day of national service,’ said Kerry aide Kelley Benander. ‘He's honoring that request.’ Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut planned to attend a memorial with firefighters in Miami and attend a private campaign fund-raiser in the evening. Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina and Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri plan no public appearances, aides said. ‘The governor feels that it's more appropriate not to be campaigning or doing anything perceived as political,’ said Dean spokeswoman Tricia Enright. Gephardt will be in Iowa Thursday and plans some private meetings with staffers to talk about the campaign. Aides to Carol Moseley Braun, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and Al Sharpton said they were unsure what the candidates planned to do.”

Daily Iowan (University of Iowa) editorial: Dean “isn’t really trying to reach minorities, at least not in Iowa.” Excerpt of commentary by the DI Editorial Board:  “During Howard Dean's visit to Iowa City, Daily Iowan reporters asked the front-running Democratic presidential candidate about his campaign's lack of minority supporters. He said, ‘When you have a rally like that in Iowa, it's a little tougher.’ While his statement was likely intended to reference Iowa's relatively small minority population, it still reflected a cavalier attitude toward recruiting much-needed minority support to his campaign. Pointing to Iowa's demography is not only off-base but is wholly ignorant. It also shows he isn't really trying to reach minorities, at least not in Iowa. Dean needs to realize the fault lies in the messenger, not the audience. Iowa boasts a strong minority population in some places. West Liberty, which is just a short jaunt down U.S. Highway 6 from Iowa City, has a sizable Latino population: more than 1,300 people in the town of just over 3,000… If Dean continues to say it's ‘tougher’ to get minorities, he will only alienate important constituents for any Democratic candidate and hurt his campaign. Dean's failure to broaden his reach so far is hurting him in other areas, most notably labor. Andy Stern, the president of the Service Employees International Union, said on Monday that Dean needs to broaden his support to gain labor backing. All nine candidates are in a tight race for labor endorsements, and there were signs early this week that Dean is getting the message. During his speech to the service-workers union Monday, Dean touted the Supreme Court for upholding the University of Michigan Law School's enrollment policy. Dean has done a good job shoring up support from previously ignored voting blocs, particularly students. His unprecedented Internet recruiting has propelled him into an early lead. His e-backers, however, are mostly white upper-middle-class computer users. He needs to garner more minority support in order to win the nomination. If his campaign turns a corner and becomes serious about that goal, Iowa minorities will be the first to notice. That's when Dean will acknowledge them rather than fall back on the perception of a homogenous Iowa population.” (Editor’s Note: Related coverage below – Edwards criticizes Dean for race remark during Baltimore debate.)

 … American Muslim poll released on 2nd anniversary of 9/11 shows that only 2% would vote for Bush re-election, only 3% believe GOP represents their interests.   Under the subhead “Muslim politics,” John McCaslin reported in his “Inside the Beltway” column in today’s Washington Times: On the second anniversary of the September 11 attacks, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations has released a poll that, among other things, reflects American Muslim political views. Suffice it to say the majority aren't in George W. Bush's camp. Only 2 percent said they would vote for President Bush. One in 10 Muslim respondents say they support the president's Iraq policy. Asked which 2004 presidential candidate would get their vote, American Muslims (a large majority of whom vote in presidential elections) from 41 states favor former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean (26 percent), followed by Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio (11 percent), Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts (7 percent) and former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun of Illinois (6 percent). When asked to name the political party that best represents the interests of the American Muslim community, far more respondents named the Democratic Party (27 percent) and Green Party (25 percent) than the Republican Party (3 percent). As for the television news outlet that most fairly provides coverage of Islam and Muslims, taxpayer-supported PBS topped the list. The Fox News Channel exhibits the most biased coverage, according to those polled.

Tough day for Dean: He’s not only under fire – as usual – from other wannabes, but now House Democrats give the anti-Washington hopeful a taste of real world DC politics. Letter criticizing him for Israel comments gets support from Kerry and Gephardt supporters – as well as Jewish lawmakers. Headline from this morning’s The Union Leader: “Pelosi, other Democrats knock Dean on Israel Excerpt from AP report: “Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean drew fire from House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and several Jewish lawmakers on Wednesday over his remarks concerning Israel. ‘This is not a time to be sending mixed messages,’ Dean's critics said in a letter circulated by Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., and signed by Pelosi and more than two dozen other Democratic House members who are supporting other candidates. ‘On the contrary, in these difficult times we must reaffirm our unyielding commitment to Israel's survival and raise our voices against all forms of terrorism and incitement.’ Last week at a rally in Santa Fe, N.M., Dean said an ‘enormous number’ of Israeli settlements must go to make progress in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. ‘It's not our place to take sides,’ he said…New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a Dean supporter who is Jewish, said he was comfortable with Dean's position, although Dean initially used some language that could concern some pro-Israelis. But Nadler said Dean's clarifications since then should have cleared that up. ‘This is sent out by Gephardt supporters and it should be seen for what it is -- a political document trying to exploit his statement before he has a chance to clarify it.’ Nadler said. Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said she did not sign the letter because of her endorsement of Gephardt, but because she was concerned about Dean's comments on Israel. "It is unacceptable for the U.S. to be evenhanded on these fundamental issues,’ the letter said. During the debate Tuesday night, Dean defended himself by saying he and former President Bill Clinton held the same view on the issue -- that the United States must have the trust of both sides to negotiate between the two countries. He repeated that argument during an appearance Wednesday on CNN's ‘Wolf Blitzer Reports.’…’I believe the position that I take on Israel is exactly the position the United States has taken for 54 years,’ he said on the show. But he acknowledged that saying there should be an ‘evenhanded policy’ toward the Israelis and the Palestinians may have been a poor choice of words. ‘I have since learned that is a sensitive word to use in certain communities,’ he said. ‘So perhaps I could have used a different euphemism. But the fact of the matter is, at the negotiating table, we have to have the trust of both sides.’”

Kerry vs. Dean: Wannabes find new area for battle as Kerry suggests he may break federal spending cap. Headline from this morning’s Boston Globe: “Kerry says he might exceed spending limit…Would follow suit if Dean rejects public financing” Excerpt from report by the Globe’s Michael Kranish: “Senator John F. Kerry said yesterday that he would break a federal spending cap, reject public financing for the presidential primaries, and possibly use his personal funds if Howard Dean's fund-raising strength leads the former Vermont governor to go beyond the federal spending limit. Dean sent a letter to the government in June saying he would abide by the limit, but is now considering exceeding the cap. ‘If Howard Dean decides to go live outside of it, I'm not going to wait an instant,’ Kerry said in an interview at his campaign headquarters. ‘Decision's made. I'll go outside. Absolutely. I'm not going to disarm.’ As recently as Aug. 31, the Massachusetts Democrat expressed indecision on the matter, saying only that he would ‘reserve the right’ to exceed the cap if Dean did so. No major Democratic candidate has rejected public financing and the spending cap since the voluntary program became law after the Watergate scandal. If Kerry and Dean exceed the cap, it would also enable them to break the spending limit of $729,000 in New Hampshire, setting off a financial arms race that could dramatically alter the way the campaign is run in the first-primary state, said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which studies money and politics. ‘It would probably signal the demise of the public financing system, at least as it is presently constituted,’ Noble said. ‘If the calculation is that you can't win if you take public funding and the limits that come along with it, the serious candidates are going to have to figure out a way out of that system.’ Kerry bristled when asked about the possibility that Dean may break the cap, pointing out that Dean had pledged in a letter to the Federal Election Commission that he would abide by the spending cap. The issue prompted Kerry to use some of his strongest language yet about Dean, criticizing the former Vermont governor for changing his positions on a variety of issues. ‘Somebody who wants to be president ought to keep their word,’ Kerry said. ‘I think it goes to the core of whether you are a different politician or a politician of your word or what you are.’ Dean campaign manager Joe Trippi said in a telephone interview that he didn't want to respond directly to Kerry's criticism of Dean. But Trippi said that ‘the facts have changed’ since Dean said he intended to abide by spending limits, observing that Dean has surprised people by collecting so many small donations from so many Americans. ‘I think a couple of million Americans giving $77 is totally within the spirit of our democracy,’ Trippi said. ‘I don't think writing a check to yourself or collecting bundled money is.’ He was alluding to the practice of prominent fund-raisers collecting contributions to one candidate from a number of associates…In the interview, Kerry was asked repeatedly whether he would use personal funds if Dean exceeds the cap. ‘Whatever's legal under the law,’ Kerry responded. He is married to one of the country's wealthiest women, Teresa Heinz Kerry, but there are restrictions that probably would prevent the senator from tapping her wealth. Kerry probably could tap half of their jointly owned assets, including a Beacon Hill townhouse that may be worth around $7 million. In his 1996 Senate race against William F. Weld, Kerry used jointly owned assets as collateral to pay for loans for campaign advertising.”

Lieberman keeps up attack on Bush’s efforts on the terrorism front and says it’s past time for Iraq administrator Bremer to come home. Headline from latimes.com (Los Angeles Times): “Lieberman Wants New Iraq Administrator” Excerpt from report by AP’s Nedra Pickler: “On the eve of the second anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Lieberman delivered a blistering critique of President Bush's handling of the war on terror and said an international administrator should take control of Iraq within 60 days. ‘I didn't support the war so that the U.S. could control Iraq,’ the Connecticut senator said in speech prepared for delivery to the Council on Foreign Relations, just blocks from the World Trade Center site in Manhattan. ‘Iraqis must control Iraq.’ Lieberman said it's past time for L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, to hand off control of the country's government to an international administrator. The new administrator should immediately announce a schedule for Iraq to adopt a constitution and hold free elections, he said. Lieberman has been the most unwavering supporter of the U.S.-led war in Iraq among the nine Democrats pursuing the party's presidential nomination. But he has criticized Bush's handling of diplomacy and reconstruction, and continued his line despite a warning from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Monday that criticism of Bush's handling of the Iraq war could give encouragement to terrorists. ‘The Bush administration has hoarded authority, bungled diplomacy, pushed allies to the margins, and divided rather than multiplied the strength we need to win the war on terror,’ he said. ‘I won't tie my tongue, nor should any American tie his tongue, because our Secretary of Defense thinks dissent encourages the terrorists.’ Lieberman also said Bush has done nothing effective to reduce the nuclear threat from North Korea, get tough on Iran's ties to terrorism and secure stray nuclear material in the former Soviet Union. He said he would double investment in the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program that has destroyed more than 6,000 nuclear warheads and thousands of missiles and launchers in the former Soviet Union.”

Edwards counters Dean’s race remark at Tuesday night’s debate – and even Associated Press reporter Pickler notes that “Dean was wrong.” Headline on washingtonpost.com: “Edwards Critical of Dean Over Race Remark” Excerpt from Pickler’s report posted yesterday: “Democrat Howard Dean's claim that he is the only white politician who talks about race to white audiences drew criticism Wednesday from one of his presidential rivals. Sen. John Edwards said the entire field discusses racial issues on the campaign trail. ‘I think what Howard Dean said last night does a disservice to everyone he stood next to and all the people before us who have raised this issue over and over again in front of all audiences,’ the North Carolina lawmaker said one day after the nine candidates debated in Baltimore. Dean, defending himself against criticism that his supporters are mostly white, told the predominantly black debate crowd, ‘I'm the only white politician that ever talks about race in front of white audiences.’ Dean was wrong. Edwards urges racial tolerance in nearly ever speech he gives on the campaign trail, including addresses to white crowds. Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut talks about his efforts as a student during the 1960s civil rights movement. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts has discussed race and its role in his Vietnam service. ‘What he said last night was divisive and divisive is exactly what we're trying to overcome. He's right about one thing, politicians should talk about civil rights wherever they go. And in the future, I hope he leads by example instead of by attack,’ Edwards said in a telephone interview. ‘Sen. Lieberman marched with Martin Luther King. Sen. Kerry talks about his experience in Vietnam. I grew up in the segregated South. Fighting for civil rights is part of who I am which is why I talked about it in front of every audience and whoever I'm with,’ he said. The North Carolina lawmaker had avoided attacking his rivals until Wednesday, but his criticism is another sign that Dean's eight rivals are throwing elbows at the front-runner in an effort to force their way to the front. In previous appearances together, the candidates have looked more like a ragtag team of underdogs hankering to make the big leagues and take on President Bush. The sharpest barbs have been aimed at the president, while the candidates largely have avoided challenging each other by name. Not so Tuesday night at a debate sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus. Some of the sharpest exchanges were between front-runner Dean and Lieberman, the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2000.

Kucinich may have some explaining to do back in Ohio on abortion change when his presidential adventure ends. Under the subhead “A cautionary tale” in the “Inside Politics” column in yesterday’s Washington Times, Jennifer Harper wrote: “What happens if Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich fails to win the Democratic nomination for president? He may have some explaining to do. A lifelong Catholic, Mr. Kucinich has consistently opposed abortion during his four terms in office, and counts on Catholics for support as he also seeks a fifth term in Congress. But 18 months ago, the Ohio Democrat abandoned his position and now supports a woman's right to choose, according to yesterday's Des Moines (Iowa) Register. ‘It's just thrown everybody into total confusion over where he is,’ said Molly Smith of Cleveland Right to Life. ‘He's really damaged himself on this particular issue.’ Mr. Kucinich said his views have ‘evolved,’ but have nothing to do with his presidential aspirations. ‘It became clear to me that this wasn't only about the right to choose, that this was about a woman's equality in society,’ he said. ‘The years of discussion that I had with women in Congress, with women in my own life, suddenly began to click.’ Mr. Kucinich was praised by the local Planned Parenthood center. But Jim Trakas, Republican Party chairman in Cleveland and a state lawmaker, doesn't buy it.  Mr. Kucinich's switch, he said, was a ‘blatantly political move.’”

…  “Senator Quagmire” – subhead in yesterday’s “Best of the Web Today” column on OpinionJournal.com. James Taranto wrote:Although Sen. John Kerry voted last October to authorize the president to use force in Iraq, as soon as it became clear that the president was actually going to act on that authority, Kerry joined his party's defeatist chorus. During yesterday's debate, journalist Ed Gordon asked Kerry to explain his vote in light of his subsequent opposition to liberating Iraq. Here is his answer, in full: ‘The vote is the vote. I voted to authorize. It was the right vote, and the reason I mentioned the threat is that we gave the--we had to give life to the threat. If there wasn't a legitimate threat, Saddam Hussein was not going to allow inspectors in. Now, let me make two points if I may. Ed [Gordon] questioned my answer. The reason I can't tell you to a certainty whether the president misled us is because I don't have any clue what he really knew about it, or whether he was just reading what was put in front of him. And I have no knowledge whether or not this president was in depth--I just don't know that. And that's an honest answer, and there are serious suspicions about the level to which this president really was involved in asking the questions that he should've. With respect to the question of, you know, the vote--let's remember where we were. If there hadn't been a vote, we would never have had inspectors. And if we hadn't voted the way we voted, we would not have been able to have a chance of going to the United Nations and stopping the president, in effect, who already had the votes, and who was obviously asking serious questions about whether or not the Congress was going to be there to enforce the effort to create a threat. So I think we did the right thing. I'm convinced we did.’ There actually is a simple explanation for Kerry's behavior: In October he believed supporting Iraq's liberation would be politically expedient; by the spring, he realized that opposing America's effort was much more appealing to Democratic primary voters. He can't just say he was changing his position for political reasons, so he is making the logically untenable claim that he's been consistent all along. Thus when asked to explain his thinking on the most important issue of the day, the haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat, who by the way served in Vietnam, is reduced to incoherent blather. Poor John Kerry has sunk into a verbal quagmire.”

… IOWA PRES WATCH SIDEBAR: In yesterday’s News & Observer of Raleigh, John Wagner reported that U.S. Sen. John Edwards will make his formal announcement for president in front of a shuttered textile mill in his boyhood home of Robbins. The North Carolina Democrat's announcement is scheduled for Sept. 16. Edwards' father formerly worked at the mill, owned by Milliken & Company. The plant is also featured in a campaign ad Edwards is airing. Besides Edwards, those expected to appear on the program in Robbins include North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley, former North Carolina Gov. Jim Hunt and former Charlotte Mayor Harvey Gantt.

Service Employees International delays decision as Edwards gains – and Kerry stumbles – in the endorsement derby. Excerpt from report by AP’s Leigh Strope: “The largest union in the AFL-CIO decided Wednesday to delay making a presidential endorsement, although John Edwards surged from unknown to contender while John Kerry stumbled. Service Employees International Union officials said members weren't ready to commit to one of nine Democrats vying to challenge President Bush next year. An endorsement probably won't come until November, said President Andy Stern. Even so, the top contenders shuffled slightly after 1,500 state and local union leaders heard from the candidates Monday. Edwards, the North Carolina senator, catapulted into the top three, pushing out Kerry, the Massachusetts senator. Former Vermont governor Howard Dean and Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, the traditional labor favorite, remained on the list, Stern said. He would not disclose rankings and vote totals…SEIU members before Monday didn't know much about Edwards. But he ‘introduced himself powerfully, and moved from having almost no support to being one of the top three candidates that the members leaving this conference are interested in,’ Stern said. Several SEIU members said they liked Edwards' populist message and his John F. Kennedyesque good looks. In nearly every speech he gives, and Monday's was no different, he highlighted his working-class background as the son of a mill worker. Stern cautioned that Kerry, who has lost his front-runner status to Dean, still had a lot of support in the union, with the rankings reflecting just the views of the 1,500 leaders at this week's conference. Conference participants were asked to rank their two favorites before and after they heard the candidates. Many arrived already enthusiastic about Dean, and after hearing him, ‘their enthusiasm is unabated,’ Stern said. ‘I think Howard Dean is making a series of statements that are very important and powerful,’ he said. Gephardt, who has been plagued with concerns about his ability to excite Democratic voters, increased his support, Stern said, noting that members responded favorably to his fiery and passionate speech. He too emphasizes his blue-collar roots and his Teamster father in his speeches. Gephardt has staked his presidential ambition on support from organized labor, and has received 12 union endorsements so far. No other candidate has won backing from an international union. But Gephardt's support is mostly from trades and industrial unions, reflecting the common divide in organized labor between traditional, blue-collar unions and public and service sector unions. SEIU is the nation's fastest growing union and among the most liberal and racially diverse, making it an enticing prize for Democrats seeking labor support. Its members are janitors, nursing home workers, home health care workers, hospital nurses and government employees. Many are Hispanic. Gephardt, who stumbled in his 1988 bid, must convince leaders like Stern that the lectern-pounding, red-faced, emotional candidate of Monday is for real if he is to have a shot at a laborwide, AFL-CIO endorsement next month. It's a difficult task made even tougher by Dean, who is wooing labor leaders with the large crowds he has attracted and his successful Internet fund-raising. The wild card remains Wesley Clark. Stern said his union would take a serious look at the retired Army general who has been flirting with a run. Clark was invited to this week's conference, but was unable to attend. SEIU leaders hope to meet with him in the next week or two, Stern said. Meanwhile, Clark has promised to reveal his presidential plans by the end of next week.”

CNN report noted that Gephardt faced two challenging closed-door meeting in Washington yesterday. Excerpt from report – headlined, “When we get behind closed doors…” – by John Mercurio of the CNN political unit: “Thousands of closed-door meetings will take place in Washington today, but Dick Gephardt cares mostly about two of them. One power powwow this morning on Capitol Hill will help decide how much money Gephardt raises by a key September 30 deadline. The other, a few hours later in Dupont Circle, will determine whether the '04 Dem continues to amass union backing or loses a key labor battle to Howard Dean. Unfortunately for us reporters, neither of these meetings is expected to yield major news -- at least not today. Which may not be bad news for Gephardt…Meeting No. 1: At 8 a.m. EDT, Gephardt plans to huddle with most of the 31 House Democrats backing his '04 bid to ask for more fund-raising help. (One notable no-show: Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a strong supporter, who apparently has a scheduling conflict.) The meeting is going down at the Dutko Group's headquarters on Capitol Hill. Gephardt's campaign chief of staff, Steve Elmendorf, downplayed the immediate impact of the meeting. He said Gephardt meets with House colleagues periodically to talk about the '04 race and get updates on the battle for the House. It's hard to deny, though, that this mid-September meeting has special significance for Gephardt, given how crucial his third-quarter fund-raising report will beMeeting No. 2: The second meeting that Gephardt's watching is scheduled to occur early this afternoon at the Washington Hilton and Towers in upper Dupont Circle, where the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is wrapping up its four-day political conference. The influential union's 60-plus-member executive board will then convene to decide whether to get behind an '04 Dem and, if so, whom. ‘Whom’ is looking increasingly like either Gephardt or Dean. But ‘whom’ is not likely to be decided this week, according to '04 Dem sources bold enough to predict the thinking of SEIU board members and their president, Andy Stern, considered one of the union movement's least autocratic leaders. The union's expected decision to delay their endorsement for a month is good news for Gephardt, given the strong showing Dean made before the SEIU on Monday. If Dean grabs the SEIU's nod, it would hurt Gephardt more than any other '04 Dem. In other words, it's much better for Gephardt to hear nothing this week than to learn that one of the biggest and most influential unions is siding with Dean. But Elmendorf said the former Vermont governor faces a key problem with the SEIU and, ultimately, the Democratic primary base. His campaign, Elmendorf said, is too white. ‘The biggest problem Dean has with that union is that they are very sensitive to a candidate's Latino and African-American support. I think they're concerned about his overwhelmingly white support,’ Elmendorf said.”

… “Taking a risk, Lieberman takes on Howard Dean” – headline from yesterday’s The Union Leader. Analysis by AP’s Ron Fournier, an excerpt: “Sen. Joe Lieberman has finally found his voice, and he's raising it against Howard Dean. Lieberman, the party's 2000 vice presidential candidate, reached up from the second tier of a nine-candidate Democratic field and criticized the front-runner's policies on Iraq and the Middle East during the Tuesday night debate. He was almost alone in attacking Dean. While the others still fear backlash from negative tactics, Lieberman is embracing the bash-Dean strategy to distinguish himself from the crowded field. ‘I think in many respects he's helping himself,’ said Michael Coleman, Democratic mayor of Columbus, Ohio. ‘He came across as a man who believes what he's saying and doesn't mind who he takes on to say it.’ But several other Democrats said Lieberman's performance illustrates why his rivals shied away from attacking Dean, even at the risk of allowing Dean to build on his momentum. ‘It basically sounded shrill to me,’ said Joe Shanahan, veteran Democratic activist in Iowa. ‘Lieberman didn't make his point well, and Dean responded strongly.’ One thing Democrats agreed upon: Dean smoothly fielded Lieberman's blows and faced few others, thus he left the debate as he arrived -- unscathed and still the front-runner. The sparks flew midway through the debate when Lieberman criticized Dean for telling supporters last week that there are an ‘enormous number’ of Israeli settlements that must go. ‘It's not our place to take sides in the conflict,’ Dean said. Lieberman, who is Jewish, said Tuesday night that Dean's comments ‘break a 50-year record in which presidents, Republicans and Democrats, members of Congress of both parties have supported our relationship with Israel.’ Dean compared his record to former President Bill Clinton and told Lieberman: ‘It doesn't help...to demagogue this issue.’ Democrats said they noticed Dean didn't rise to Lieberman's bait and flash his self-admitted temper. In fact, Dean seemed to relish the exchange with Lieberman.

 


go to page 2                                                                                                             click here  to read past Iowa Daily Reports

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine