Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news">

Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

The Democrat Candidates

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

John Edwards

excerpts from the Iowa Daily Report

August 17-31, 2003

.... “Edwards Criticizes ‘Shooting Gallery’” – headline from Friday’s News & Observer, the NC Sen’s home state paper. Excerpt from report by the N & O’s John Wagner: “U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina stepped up his criticism of President Bush's handling of post-war Iraq and lamented the continuing deaths of U.S. servicemen during campaign stops in Iowa Thursday. ‘We've got a bunch of young people in a shooting gallery over there,’ the White House aspirant said during a meeting with Democratic activists gathered at an Elks Lodge in Mason City. The North Carolina Democrat blamed Bush for not adequately preparing for the war's aftermath. Edwards, who supported the war, also said Bush was too slow to invite allies to help stabilize the country. ‘It is an absolute, stubborn arrogance,’ Edwards said. ‘It is a huge mistake.’ The Mason City stop was part of Day Two of Edwards' ‘Real Solutions Express’ bus tour in Iowa. Later in the day, Edwards pitched his health-care plan, which would require parents to insure their children, at a forum in Des Moines Thursday hosted by Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack. Edwards told the audience that providing health insurance for children is as important as making sure they get an education. ‘There is no moral difference between the two,’ Edwards said.”(8/17/2003)

Blame Bush – Dem hopefuls suggest that the president pulled the plug on the northeastern United States. With wannabes wandering IA, Associated Press’ caucus watcher Mike Glover decided to highlight their reaction to the blackout. Want to guess who they criticized? Excerpt – datelined Cedar Rapids – from Glover coverage: “The Democratic presidential contenders blamed President Bush Friday for the massive blackout in the northeastern United States, saying the White House's refusal to invest in the nation's infrastructure caused the problem. ‘It underscores a blackout in this administration on energy policies,’ Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry said. ‘They have ignored the investment needs of our infrastructure in favor of a tax cut for the wealthy.’ Northeastern cities from New York City across to Toledo, Ohio, were gripped by a massive blackout Thursday afternoon that left officials scrambling to restore power and searching for causes of the failure. While no one has yet pinpointed a cause, Democrats were quick to bash Bush. Missouri Rep. Richard Gephardt argued that the blackouts can be linked to flaws in Bush and the Republican party's energy policy. ‘These events illustrate how shortsighted the Bush administration and Republican-controlled Congress were in 2001 when they rejected modernization of our nation's power grid,’ Gephardt said. Much of the criticism came during a labor forum featuring six of the Democratic presidential candidates. One of the candidates, the Rev. Al Sharpton, was forced to cancel because of jumbled air schedules after the blackout. Florida Sen. Bob Graham said Bush called for new investment in electrical transmission systems but Republicans blocked a Democratic effort to do just that. ‘Just two years ago, he and his allies in Congress blocked a Democratic proposal to invest $350 million in upgrading America's electrical grid system,’ Graham said. ‘The blackout is further evidence that America needs to invest in its infrastructure.’ North Carolina Sen. John Edwards chose not to immediately attack Bush. ‘I think we need to find out what happened,’ Edwards said. Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean said the Bush administration, through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, tried to merge the New England's electrical grid with New York's when he still governor. ‘I raised hell and told them they better get a lot of lawyers,’ he said in a telephone interview. ‘The president always sees bigger as being better and that's not true. What we really need to do is let local people take care of things. What we need is good, strong regional grids. We do not need huge mega-grids.’ Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich said he has fought the big utilities since he was the mayor of Cleveland and resisted efforts to sell of the city's utilities. ‘I stood to the Enrons of that day, and I'll stand up to the Enrons of this day,’ Kucinich said. Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, speaking earlier at the state fair, said the blackouts, along with the latest virus attacks on the Internet, have Americans feeling less secure even though neither event has been linked to terrorism. ‘Electricity is too important to the quality of life to all of the American people to allow it to become a gap in homeland security,’ Lieberman said.” (8/17/2003)

“Free trade: Running from reality won’t help” – headline on editorial in Friday’s The Union Leader. Editorial excerpt: “Free trade is one of the reasons the American economy experienced such notable growth during the 1990s. The down side is that it has cost some American jobs, and Democrats running for President are exploiting that to win votes, even though NAFTA was President Clinton’s baby. At a candidate’s forum in Iowa on Wednesday, Dick Gephardt, John Edwards, John Kerry, Howard Dean, Bob Graham and Dennis Kucinich all bashed NAFTA to some extent. Gephardt and Kucinich oppose free trade. Dean said he would support changes to NAFTA to make foreign workers abide by the same rules as American workers. Edwards said he would have voted against the trade pact had he been in office. Kerry and Graham, who voted for NAFTA, said they now think it needs to provide more job protections. Adam Smith disagrees with all of them. He wrote of trade, ‘It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy…What is prudence in the conduct of every private family, can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom. If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage.’ That is no less true today than it was in 1776, when The Wealth of Nations was published. Protectionism may temporarily save some jobs in some industries, but in the long run it is costlier than the alternative. Is Clinton the only Democrat who still grasps this?” (8/17/2003)

Most observers probably thought Edwards was already running for the Dem nomination, but it turns out he won’t announce until mid-September. The only question now – see Notable Quotable above – is whether he’s going to announce in North Carolina or North Korea? Excerpt from AP report – “North Carolina Sen. John Edwards said Friday that he will formally announce his candidacy for president Sept. 16 in Robbins, N.C., where he grew up. ‘Robbins is a very special place for me,’ Edwards said. ‘It's where I grew up. It's home to my family. And it's where I learned the values of hard work, responsibility and fairness that made country this great.’ Edwards was born in South Carolina but spent his teenage years in Robbins, now a struggling mill town of about 1,200 residents. His campaign also said Friday that Edwards will be the first Democratic candidate to air ads in South Carolina, which has the first-in-the-South presidential primary Feb. 3. The ads start airing Monday. Two of the ads have been running in Iowa and New Hampshire for eight days. A third ad debuts in South Carolina and shows Edwards outside the Seneca, S.C., mill village house where he lived after he was born. Edwards' spokeswoman would not say how much the campaign is spending on the ads.”(8/17/2003)

Three for the road – or, in this case, union picnic: Kucinich, “Lou Grant” and Edwards, but Edwards skips before Kucinich and Ed Asner arrived. Report – an excerpt – from coverage in yesterday’s Quad-City Times by Linda Cook: “Although two Democratic presidential candidates appeared Sunday afternoon, a veteran actor and political activist shared their spotlight. Edward Asner, who is most recognized for his portrayal of journalist Lou Grant on the ‘Mary Tyler Moore Show’ and the spin-off series ‘Lou Grant,’ spoke Sunday to about 200 people. The third annual Democrats with Labor Picnic and Folkfest was held outdoors at the Carpenters Local Union No. 4 on West Kimberly Road in Davenport. Asner urged those attending to become politically active — ‘Look at America, for God’s sake,’ he said after Kucinich’s address. ‘If we all didn’t do something, we’ll go farther down the sewer than we already have.’ Asner said that Americans are losing their freedoms…Many of those attending came up to shake Asner’s hand and to have their photos taken with him. Lots of cameras were trained on the candidates, too, of course. U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, whom Asner endorsed, drew a standing ovation with his energetic support for labor.  Asner and Kucinich earlier attended a River Bandits game, where Kucinich threw out the first pitch. ‘There are certain benefits to running for president,’ he said.  Kucinich emphasized jobs throughout his speech…’When I’m elected president, NAFTA is history,’ he said. Kucinich discussed his plan for a new WPA, or Works Progress Administration, program ‘to put America back to work.’ He added that he plans to announce a new program to expand NASA. ‘America must be the country that keeps the new technologies moving forward,’ he said. U.S. Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., also was on hand earlier in the day. He talked about his plan to create jobs and help working Americans. ‘Every time President Bush steps up to announce another economic plan, what happens? We lose jobs,’ Edwards said. ‘Every time the president says that a recovery is just around the corner, millions of Americans start collecting unemployment checks instead of paychecks.’ Edwards said he plans to help workers who have been hit hard by the Bush economy, companies moving jobs overseas and foreign trade. Edwards proposes giving a 10 percent tax cut to corporations that produce goods in the United States.”(8/19/2003)

Black churches become popular destinations for the Dem wannabes in South Carolina with as many as 1.2 million votes at stake in the first-in-the-South primary.   Headline from the New Hampshire Sunday News: “Democrats court south’s critical black voters” Excerpt – datelined Denmark, SC – by AP’s Amy Geier Edgar: “U.S. Sen. John Edwards visited the site of the nation's first school for freed slaves on St. Helena Island. U.S. Rep. Dick Gephardt has campaigned at the predominantly black Longshoreman's union near the Charleston docks. And almost all nine of the Democrats looking to win their party's nomination for president have visited a black church in South Carolina. South Carolina's 1.2 million blacks are an irresistible Democratic block that could make up half the voters in the state's first-in-the-South presidential primary Feb. 3…For now, the Democratic candidates are taking the tried-and-true path to black voters - the church. The Rev. Joe Darby, pastor of Morris Brown AME Church in Charleston, said he's had contact with all the candidates. ‘We've got candidates coming out our ears,’ he said. U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and U.S. Sen. Bob Graham of Florida all have spoken to congregations at predominantly black churches. Gephardt has spoken with health workers at a predominantly black church. The Rev. Al Sharpton has been a regular visitor to black churches, most recently at the Chapel Hill Baptist Church in Santee… Other candidates have taken different tacks to reach black voters. Edwards went to the Penn Center, which runs a number of community outreach programs for island residents and began in 1862 as a school for freed slaves after Union forces captured the area early in the Civil War. Graham and Lieberman both have visited Allen University, South Carolina's oldest historically black college. Former ambassador and Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, the other black candidate, has met with the state branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and other black community leaders. Most of the campaigns have hired black staffers. U.S. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., has the backing of black New York Congressman Gregory Meeks, who visited supporters throughout South Carolina on Kerry's behalf. He plans to begin a grass-roots campaign in South Carolina next month, Meeks said. U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich is one of the few candidates who has not had a real presence in South Carolina. The Ohio Democrat has been focusing more of his efforts in Iowa, said campaign spokesman Jeff Cohen.”(8/19/2003)

The Kings of Political Plagiarism: Dean, Edwards, Kerry, Lieberman, etc., etc. Headline from Sunday’s Boston Globe: “Democrats recognize a good line…Candidates recycle campaign material” Excerpt – datelined Mason City – from report by the Globe’s Glen Johnson: “Senator Joseph I. Lieberman was so angry that the White House had blocked union protection for members of the new Homeland Security Department that he let President Bush have it last week as he sat beside his rivals for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. ‘Did anybody ask the firefighters and the police officers, all of whom were union members, whether they thought once about that before they went into those burning buildings on Sept. 11 and risked their lives, whether they were going to choose between the unions and security? No way!’ the Connecticut senator said in Philadelphia, during a candidate forum arranged by the Sheet Metal Workers International Association. A few minutes later, Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts expressed similar outrage. ‘This president is so quick to give speeches about the heroes of New York City,’ Kerry said. ‘Well, I look forward to reminding him that every single one of those heroes that went up those stairs and gave their lives so that someone else might live was a member of organized labor.’ To the audience, it may have sounded like Kerry was lifting from Lieberman, but in reality, it was Lieberman who was clipping from Kerry. In a comical game of ‘Whose Line Is It Anyway?’ candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination are stealing one another's best lines. Most often, the crime takes place with little notice, as the candidates stump separately around the country. At other times, as in Philadelphia, it occurs in full view of the victim. No one's hands are completely clean. Lieberman is not the only offender, and Kerry is not the only victim. So far, everyone is laughing about it, for the most part, with no candidate suffering serious repercussions. On Tuesday in Mason City, Kerry ripped off Senator John Edwards of North Carolina as he blasted Bush for not supporting family farmers. Kerry accused the president of being an urban cowboy out of touch with average Americans. ‘We need a president who understands that connection to the land, for whom it's not just a question of sashaying around a ranch, recently bought, with a big belt buckle,’ Kerry said. Edwards lifted an eyebrow when told of the comment, recalling what he said June 22 as he and Kerry attended a candidate forum in Newton. ‘This president is a complete, unadulterated phony,’ Edwards said at the time. ‘He believes that because he walks around on that ranch down in Crawford with that big belt buckle that he's standing for working people.’ In an interview, Edwards chuckled and said: ‘It's politics. Those kinds of things happen.’ Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri deadpanned, ‘We have filed copyright on 10 phrases.’ He protested that the administration seems to have claimed ownership of the phrase ‘shock and awe’ after the bombing of Iraq, so ‘I'm trying to come up with phrases I can copyright.’ The candidates say the byplay is the product of their frequent joint appearances, already nearing a dozen for the year, with five debates still on the way. They also say it is natural to gravitate toward similar types of criticism, given their philosophical differences with Bush and the Republican Party. In addition, many of the candidates are seeking advice from the same people, including former president Bill Clinton. But the candidates also plead guilty to a bit of political plagiarism. Sometimes the loot is an effective turn of phrase. Other times, it is political policy, triggering protests from the candidates' advisers and e-mail exchanges with charges and countercharges of thievery. Both the Kerry and Gephardt teams, for example, have sniped as the candidates have talked about achieving energy independence by ‘going to the moon here on Earth,’ in Kerry's words, or through an ‘Apollo Project’ in the United States, in Gephardt's phrasing.”(8/19/2003)

“Claims that recall madness in California has sucked all the oxygen out of national politics are hooey. Thankfully, folks in Iowa are more high-minded.” – Sentence from the following account indicating that Wannabe Madness continues in IA despite distractions. Headline from Houston Chronicle: “It’s Iowa, it’s almost time, get over it” Excerpt from Sunday commentary by the Chronicle’s Cragg Hines: “While you've been fixating on the redistricting mess and checking out those naked pictures of ‘Governor’ Schwarzenegger on the Internet, I've been tramping through the tall corn in Iowa to bring you the latest on the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. Claims that recall madness in California has sucked all the oxygen out of national politics are hooey. Thankfully, folks in Iowa are more high-minded. The Democratic race is for real, and no matter if you insist on finishing a few more trashy novels before Labor Day, conscientious fellow-Americans in Iowa are hard at work sorting out the candidates. Just five months from Monday night, Iowa Democrats will shiver and/or slog their way to caucuses all over the state and start the nominating process. Don't blink or you'll miss the rest of it. Within six or seven weeks (probably by the time that Texas as well as California, New York and a bunch of other states hold primaries on March 2) it is likely to be all over. You have been warned. Already six of the nine Democratic candidates seem headed for no-hope-ville. Iowa appears to be doing its traditional job of winnowing the field -- perhaps with a vengeance this time around. Judging by a sampling of candidate outings last week, only former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, former House Democratic Leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts have a real shot. This is not wild speculation. It's what Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack and other Democrats are saying, much to the chagrin of the remainder of the field, especially Sens. Bob Graham of Florida and John Edwards of North Carolina, whose aides have complained to Vilsack's office. On a too infrequent trip to Iowa, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, only the party's 2000 vice presidential candidate, greeted Vilsack with: ‘Hi. I'm a second-tier candidate.’ The protests availeth not. ‘It's three. The perception is correct,’ said David Nagle, former state Democratic chairman. ‘The one thing that separates the three is that Dean has passion.’ Nagle recalled that Theodore White said he knew John F. Kennedy was going to win in 1960 when he saw girls along JFK's motorcades jumping. ‘Dean's the only one with girls jumping,’ Nagle said (speaking in metaphor, you understand). The question is, can Dean keep the girls (and boys), many of whom are new to politics, jumping for five months? The test is most critical for Gephardt, who won the Iowa caucuses in 1988 (only to crater when contributions ran out not far down the campaign trail). He cannot survive a defeat in Iowa in January. Gephardt basically acknowledges the daunting scenario. ‘I'm going to win in Iowa,’ he said shortly after loading about 100 inch-thick locally bred pork chops on a medieval-looking grill at the State Fair in Des Moines last week. Iowa Democrats, even some who wish Gephardt all the best, wonder, however, about his dedication to what could be a political swan song.”(8/19/2003)

Edwards – who often appears to be on an issue-a-day pace – outlines his college loan plan while wrapping up extensive Iowa tour. Headline from FOXNews.com: “Edwards Calls for Revamping College Loans” Excerpt from report – dateline: Des Moines – by AP caucus-watcher Mike Glover: “Sen. John Edwards is calling for revamping the nation's college loan program, eliminating the role of banks and making loans directly to students from the federal government. The North Carolinian, seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, believes such a move would save ‘billions of dollars’ each year and allow financial assistance to be provided to an additional 3 million youngsters every year. ‘We should give the money to the people who need it the most, our kids,’ Edwards said in remarks prepared for delivery here Monday. Currently, the federal government offers subsidies to banks and other lenders to lower interest rates on student loans, but the loans are actually made by the financial institutions. Under Edwards' plan, the loans would come directly from the federal government, which also would have to assume the liability for loans that aren't repaid. The plan Edwards was releasing does not carry a specific pricetag, but he said the money currently being paid to financial institutions could be shifted to student aid programs, including his ‘college for everyone’ proposal. Under that package, students who pass college prep classes and agree to work at least 10 hours a week would be offered free tuition at community colleges or public universities. Edwards said he was timing his announcement to coincide with the opening of the new school year. ‘Parents are getting ready to buy their kids new school clothes and supplies,’ said Edwards. ‘But for parents and students who are about to go to college, they're in sticker shock from the increase in college tuition.’ A sour economy and budget cuts in states around the country have forced most colleges to sharply increase tuition, and Edwards said there are projections that up to 500,000 students a year are being forced to forego college because of rising costs. In addition, Edwards called for an ending of ‘legacy’ admissions, a policy where colleges routinely admit the children of alumni. He said that makes it tougher for students who are the first in the family to attend college to gain admission. He also called for an increase in spending on Pell Grants, a need-based grant program aimed at aiding low-income youngsters in financing college costs. The proposal came as Edwards wrapped up a six-day bus swing across Iowa, where precinct caucuses in January open the presidential nominating season.” (8/20/2003)

The favorite media story of the week. When national political reporters weren’t writing about Lieberman’s latest attack or slippage in the polls, they were working the story on John Edwards’ Big Decision. Over recent days, newspapers from Boston to Los Angeles – not to mention North Carolina – have reported their versions of the Edwards situation. The DSM Register’s Beaumont joined in yesterday. Headline from the Register: “Sen. John Edwards, well-financed but little known, is at a turning point in his campaign for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination. Facing pressure from North Carolina Democrats to choose between the nomination race and a Senate re-election bid, Edwards is airing television ads in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina in hopes of raising his profile and poll numbers in the early nominating states. ‘The Senate seat is something I know I'm going have to make a decision about at some point,’ Edwards said Monday aboard his tour bus titled ‘Solutions Express’ after meeting with Democrats at the Second Street Cafe in Ottumwa. ‘I am 100 percent committed to getting the nomination.’ Edwards begins a bus trip across New Hampshire Wednesday, like the six-day trip he wrapped up in Iowa on Monday, with the belief that he can rally Democrats to his candidacy if they take time to learn who he is. Longtime North Carolina state Rep. Mickey Michaux of Durham said the longer Edwards waits, the more it hurts the Democrats' chance of holding the Senate seat. ‘The bottom line is people need to know, and need to know in a hurry, what he's going to do,’ said Michaux. ‘I think there are a lot of folks who feel that way in the party. He should be making up his mind real, real soon.’ Democratic Senate campaign officials say privately Edwards, an effective fund-raiser who won the seat in 1998 largely without party financial help, may not feel pressure to decide because he is not beholden to the party for his election. He has reported raising nearly $12 million in 2003, second-most among the nine Democrats seeking the nomination. He has until late February to file to run for re-election to the Senate, but has given no deadline. Edwards came in fifth in The Des Moines Register's Iowa Poll last month, with 5 percent of likely caucusgoers saying he was their first choice. He has similar numbers in New Hampshire.”(8/20/2003)

Edwards introduces his book of policy proposals, but the Register’s Beaumont wonders why he left out standard references to his father working at the mill and his mother working for the post office? Under the subhead “John Edwards, now with an office and handy pamphlet near you,” Beaumont wrote in his online “Caucus Notebook” column: “Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina now has 14 Iowa campaign offices and one shiny new information guide with details of his policy proposals, the campaign reported this week. Undeterred by his 5 percent showing in the Des Moines Sunday Register's first Iowa Poll of Democratic caucus activists, Edwards now has Iowa offices from the Missouri River coast to Mississippi River coast, from Burlington to Sioux City, including less common field spots such as Ottumwa and Fort Dodge. Edwards also released the booklet Tuesday, 65 pages with everything from his recently announced health care plan to the rural economic initiative he outlined in Iowa in May. It even has a letter from Edwards that reads remarkably like an abbreviated version of Edwards' stump speech, complete with a reference to ‘growing up in a small town in North Carolina.’ No mention of the mill or the post office. Maybe that's in the sequel.”(8/20/2003)

Edwards trying to build a political firewall between the early nominating contests and the later Southern states. Headline from yesterday’s Chicago Tribune: “Edwards seeks a bounce…Anointed the ‘sexiest politician in America’ early in the race, the senator from North Carolina now needs a political comeback to remain a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination” Excerpt from report – datelined Richmond – by the Trib’s Jeff Zeleny: “The most admired fresh face in the presidential race once belonged to Sen. John Edwards, who downplayed being anointed People magazine's ‘sexiest politician in America’ while telling Democrats that his charisma and Southern roots could win back the White House. But the ascending candidacy of former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, as well as a crowded field of nine contenders, has complicated the political path for Edwards. Suddenly, after spending a year convincing party leaders that he was presidential material, the North Carolina senator is fending off suggestions that his campaign has gone dormant and that he is having second thoughts about the race. ‘It's a fantasy. It's not true,’ Edwards said in an interview, exasperated by reports he might shelve his presidential ambitions and seek another term in the Senate next year. ‘I am 100 percent committed to this race for the presidency and I am in it to the end.’ The lifeline for Edwards may rest in Virginia and a collection of other Southern states, which for the first time are playing a pivotal role in the presidential nominating season. The traditional early-balloting states of Iowa and New Hampshire are followed by primary elections in South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee and Oklahoma, where Edwards hopes he can build a February firewall that would sustain his campaign until a nominee is chosen. So this week, between the conclusion of a six-day bus tour in Iowa and the opening day of a similar journey across New Hampshire, Edwards made a quick visit to Richmond to pursue a Plan B strategy. He hopes to gain ground on rivals who so far have edged him out of the first, second and third positions in the opening states of the 2004 presidential campaign. ‘If he's going to make the argument that he's going to win, he has to show that he can take Southern states,’ said Jim Nachman, a Richmond lawyer who heard Edwards speak at a Capital Club breakfast reception Wednesday. ‘It's not lost on me that the past three Democratic presidents were from the South.’ The fact that Edwards hails from the same side of the Mason-Dixon Line as Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton has been one of the strongest selling points of an otherwise unlikely presidential bid for Edwards, who has yet to complete his first term in the Senate. In fact, among the Democratic candidates, only Al Sharpton has less experience in elective office. But after raising more money than any other candidate during the first three months of the year, Edwards now has embarked on an aggressive plan to introduce--and in some cases reintroduce--himself to voters in the early states. To regain its footing, the campaign has purchased more than $1 million in advertisements in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, telling his son-of-a-millworker-makes-good tale. The aggressive television push, coming before Labor Day when political campaigns traditionally intensify, underscores the urgent concern for Edwards. Polls routinely show him near the bottom of the field, registering only 2 percent in a New Hampshire survey last week and 5 percent in the Iowa Poll in late July. While Edwards disagrees that there is an 11th-hour urgency to his campaign, he concedes that the coming months are critical if his presidential aspirations are to continue. ‘My job is to make sure they touch me and see me,’ Edwards said last week, as Iowa corn and soybean fields passed by the windows of his campaign bus. ‘Over the next three months--August, September, October, maybe into November--I need to be moving.’ Few voters and Democratic activists are paying careful attention to the candidates or the campaign this early in the race. But several of Edwards' admirers said privately that the momentum built by Dean, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri are troubling and may be difficult to overcome.”(8/22/2003)

Former Iowa “Governor” Fulton supports Edwards while Dean gets backing of former Marines Corps commandant. From Associated Press roundup report: “Trying to shore up his lack of military expertise, presidential candidate Howard Dean announced Thursday that he has been endorsed by former Gen. Joseph P. Hoar, former commandant of the Marine Corps and the successor to Norman Schwartzkopf as head of U.S. Central Command. The former Vermont governor has been a vehement critic of the war in Iraq but that position, and his lack of foreign policy experience, have raised questions about his ability to convince voters that he could lead the U.S. military. Meanwhile, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards said his campaign for president has been endorsed by 210 Democratic activists in Iowa, including former Iowa Gov. Robert Fulton.” (8/22/2003)

Between bus tours of Iowa and New Hampshire, Edwards stops in Virginia to deliver attack on GWB. Headline from Wednesday’s News & Observer: “Edwards bashes Bush on jobs, civil liberties” Excerpt of report from Richmond by AP’s Bob Lewis: “Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards criticized President Bush on the issues of civil liberties and job creation Tuesday, accusing the president of turning his back on factory workers and giving companies incentives to leave the United States. Edwards cited thousands of job losses when Pillowtex closed factories in North Carolina and Virginia last month. ‘The best way for us to make sure we have an economic recovery is to make sure George W. Bush gets another job next year,’ Edwards told about 100 people at a morning campaign gathering in downtown Richmond… Edwards said the Bush administration was more interested in the welfare of chief executives than workers and was actually providing incentives for manufacturers to move their operations overseas. ‘The last thing we need to be doing is giving our companies a reason to leave America,’ Edwards said in advocating creation of a national venture capital fund that would provide inducements to help companies such as Pillowtex to keep their operations in small American towns. Shawn Smith, spokesman for the state Republican Party, said most Virginians ‘support the president's plan to strengthen the economy and create jobs by allowing taxpayers to keep and invest more of their own money. John Edwards has no solutions other than to be critical of the president.’ Edwards also alleged that the Bush administration and Attorney General John Ashcroft had weakened protections for civil liberties as a result of the anti-terrorism Patriot Act. ‘We cannot allow people like John Ashcroft to take away our rights,’ Edwards said as the crowd clapped loudly and some shouted, ‘Amen!’ Said Smith: ‘John Edwards' scare tactics will not take away from the intent of the Patriot Act - to protect our citizens from another terror attack.’”(8/22/2003)

… “Edwards: Upgrade grid to improve home security” – headline from Friday’s The Union Leader. Excerpt from AP report from Newington: “Presidential hopeful John Edwards said Thursday that upgrading the nation’s power system and ending market manipulation will strengthen homeland security.  Edwards outlined his plan for better homeland security and emergency preparedness at a parking lot near Newington’s fossil-fuel power plant. The press conference was part of a 29-stop, six-day bus tour to woo more New Hampshire voters before the tentatively set primary on Jan. 27.  Calling last week’s blackout a ‘call to action’, the senator from North Carolina said lawmakers need to pass mandatory reliability standards for the nation’s power grids. Edwards also proposed giving $50 billion to state and local governments, $10 billion of which would be designated for firefighters, policemen and emergency medical technicians in local communities. State and local governments would have a ‘fair amount of discretion’ on spending the remaining $40 billion, which is intended to prevent cuts to education and first-responder departments. Improving the energy system and investing money in local governments are just two ways Edwards said he will improve emergency preparedness. Edwards wants to strip the FBI of domestic intelligence duties and create a Homeland Intelligence Agency, he said, returning to an earlier campaign pledge.  ‘(FBI agents) are structurally, poorly prepared for fighting terrorism here at home,’ Edwards said, adding he would supplement his intelligence agency with a ‘watchdog office’ to protect civil liberties. Better neighborhood watch programs, reliable emergency warning systems and more security for attractive terror targets like stadiums and skyscrapers is also needed, he said. He also targeted the chemical industry as a major flaw in homeland security.  ‘We have 123 chemical plants in America, any one of which — if subjected to a terrorist attack — that could mean one million lives or more,’ Edwards said, pledging to stop ‘special interests’ like the chemical industry.” (8/24/2003)

Edwards – like Graham – faces another obstacle in getting message about candidacy to Dem voters. Question about whether he’ll abandon pres bid for Senate re-election haunts him wherever he goes, including New Hampshire. Headline from Friday’s News and Observer in Raleigh: “Edwards quizzed about Senate” The N&O’s Washington correspondent, John Wagner, reports from Durham, NH: “U.S. Sen. John Edwards' indecision over whether to seek re-election in 2004 has been an issue back home for some time. But the subject is starting to echo on the presidential campaign trail. On Thursday, Edwards was questioned pointedly about his election plans while holding a meeting at a restaurant here. A questioner wanted to know how the North Carolina Democrat could be running in both 2004 races at once. ‘I'm running for president,’ Edwards said. ‘That's all I'm doing. What I'm doing is 100 percent running for president. ... I'm not doing anything to run for the Senate seat.’ Despite such declarations, Edwards has yet to foreclose the possibility of returning to the Senate race. Nor has he publicly given his blessing to other Democrats to start campaigning for his seat. His questioner here -- who later identified himself as a Carrboro resident who happened to be visiting New Hampshire -- said he fears that Edwards' delay could jeopardize the Democratic Party's chances of keeping the seat. ‘I disagree with you, and I know North Carolina well,’ Edwards told the man, Donald Esterling . Esterling later volunteered that he had given money to former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, one of Edwards' 2004 presidential rivals. The exchange came just days after Iowa reporters grilled Edwards about his intentions during a campaign stop in Des Moines, Iowa. At that event, a picnic that drew an enthusiastic crowd of more than 200 people, Edwards dismissed the notion that he was considering withdrawing from the presidential race as ‘fantasy.’…’I am totally in this race to stay,’ Edwards said. Campaign aides have been pleased with the size and enthusiasm of crowds drawn by Edwards in the past week -- a sign, they hope, that Edwards is starting to gain traction…Meanwhile, Edwards' dilemma about his Senate seat has been highlighted in newspaper stories this week in The New York Times and the Boston Globe, the latter of which circulates in New Hampshire. George Stephanopoulos and a crew from his Sunday morning ABC News program were on hand here to witness Thursday's exchange.”(8/24/2003)

Edwards takes on No Child Left Behind Act, opposes vouchers and expresses reservations about charter schools during New Hampshire tour. Headline from yesterday’s The Union Leader: “In Franklin, Edwards criticizes charter schools” An excerpt: “Democratic Presidential hopeful Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina told a small but enthusiastic group at the Franklin Diner yesterday that he opposes school voucher programs and has serious doubts that charter schools will improve education. ‘I doubt that charter schools can be used to regenerate our educational system,’ said Edwards, who believes a better approach would be to focus on improving public schools. The state Board of Education earlier this week gave a green light to the proposed Franklin Career Academy, which a group of business leaders hopes to open by January. It would be the state’s first charter school. Edwards told the approximately 20 people in attendance that he also has reservations about accountability of charter schools, which operate independently of the public school system and don’t have to follow the same standards. Discussing Bush administration policies, Edwards accused the President of shifting the tax burden to local communities through the No Child Left Behind Act. He also said the administration was dragging its feet on a prescription drug benefit program for the elderly and on other social programs.  ‘They give tax cuts to people at the top and now say that there’s no money for the programs that people need,’ he said.  Edwards also blasted the Pentagon’s plan to reduce combat pay for those serving in Iraq and said that the nation needs a President ‘who comes from the same world as other Americans,’ pointing out that he is the son of a millworker while Bush comes from a wealthy family.” (8/24/2003)

Edwards to announce expanded Iowa TV schedule today – adding Sioux City, Ottumwa and Mason City to current buys. Excerpt from report in today’s The Union Leader by AP’s Iowa caucus-watcher Mike Glover: “North Carolina Sen. John Edwards has decided to expand his television advertising drive in Iowa and is throwing a new commercial into the mix stressing his rural roots. Campaign officials plan to announce Monday that Edwards will begin airing the commercial in Sioux City, Mason City and Ottumwa, supplementing spots currently running in Des Moines and Cedar Rapids. The new commercial will feature a 60-second spot with Edwards stressing his ties to Robbins, N.C., a tiny town where he grew up. ‘Our small towns and rural areas are hurting and Washington doesn't seem to care,’ Edwards said in a simple spot featuring him talking directly to the camera. Campaign aides put no price tag on the expanded effort, but backers said it's yet another sign that Edwards intends to compete hard in Iowa's precinct caucuses. ‘We have a strong infrastructure in place and these ads will help us build on Senator Edwards' growing support,’ said Des Moines lawyer Rob Tully, one of the chairmen of Edwards' campaign in Iowa. Edwards became the second Democratic presidential candidate to begin airing spots in Iowa when he launched the latest effort. Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean has already aired spots in the state. Most polls have shown Dean and Missouri Rep. Richard Gephardt bunched tightly near the top of the race for the state's leadoff precinct caucuses in January. Those polls have also shown Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry with significant support, while Edwards has generally languished in the single digits. Some have wondered about the strength of Edwards' commitment to campaigning in the state - worries that grew when Edwards announced plans to hold 100 town meetings in New Hampshire. Critics have suggested Edwards can't meet that schedule and still run an active campaign in Iowa. Edwards has rejected that, and pointed to a stepped up level of activity in his campaign. He just completed a showy six-day bus trip that took him to 19 counties in the state and he released a list of 210 activists who have endorsed his campaign. The expanded television buy to be announced Monday is further evidence Edwards intends to be a serious player, aides said.”(8/25/2003)

Edwards, on New Hampshire bus tour, setting accelerated pace, says he’ll hold 100 town meetings in state before January vote. Excerpt from report by the Concord Monitor: “Helen Dabilis was about to fit a pair of sneakers on the feet of a young customer at Alec's Shoe Store in Nashua when a hurricane entered the store. And this being New Hampshire in primary season, there was a presidential candidate at the center of the hurricane. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, surrounded by a scrum of television cameras and journalists, strode towards the store's fitting area. ‘I see him on TV,’ said Dabilis, who's worked at the shoe store for 40 years. ‘He's pretty good.’ She paused. ‘But I see more of Dean. He better get more exposure,’ she said of Edwards. ‘Tell him to get out there.’ Edwards followed that advice to a T yesterday, as he shook hands and squeezed shoulders along Main Street in Nashua, spoke to the employees of an engineering company in Concord and offered a free barbecue (300 hot dogs and hamburgers in less than two hours) in Manchester. It was the first day in a nearly week-long swing through New Hampshire that will take the candidate to 30 cities and towns. And that's just the beginning. Edwards said yesterday that he planned to hold 100 town hall-style forums in the state before the presidential primary in January. ‘I want to make sure not only that I get a chance to talk to as many voters as possible here in New Hampshire but also that I get a chance to hear from voters,’ Edwards said yesterday. That intense schedule mimics the format used by Sen. John McCain four years ago to win the state's Republican primary. In the months before the 2000 vote, McCain held more than 100 town hall forums across New Hampshire. But Edwards will have to work hard to repeat McCain's success here. Edwards and his aides say once the candidate begins to speak to more voters one-on-one, they will like what they hear. And more forums will provide just such an opportunity.”(8/25/2003)

Edwards takes on controversial USDA Under Secretary – and Iowan – Dorr over rural policy criticisms. Headline from Monday’s letters to the editor in the Des Moines Register: “Edwards: Dorr misstated my plan” Excerpt from Edwards’ letter: “Thomas Dorr's July 25 opinion piece (‘USDA Programs Make Our Rural Regions Stronger’) contained several errors. First, he mischaracterized my plan to create a rural business capital fund by implying this fund would take the place of other measures enacted in Senator Tom Harkin's 2002 farm bill. As President Bush's appointee to oversee rural programs at the Agriculture Department, Dorr should know better than anyone that my plan would be in addition to other measures, such as funding for rural housing and alternative-fuel programs. My proposed Rural Economic Advantage Challenge (REACH) fund will invest $1 billion to bring investors from cities together with entrepreneurs in small towns, offer training and support to these businesspeople, and put businesses into networks to help them succeed together. Second, Dorr implied that the Bush administration has been implementing rural-development measures in Harkin's farm bill, but nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, President Bush's budget eliminated the Rural Education Achievement program, which helps smaller schools buy computers and school buses, and cut the farm bill's support for rural broadband Internet service, which our farmers and small-town businesses need to compete. Lastly, Dorr failed to point out that he is a Bush appointee, and fails to explain why a Bush appointee is taking the time to attack a Democrat running for president. Maybe it's because an Edwards administration would represent the values of small-town and rural America, because that's where I grew up. President Bush comes from a different place, and seems content to help the special interests at the expense of the family farm. – Senator John Edwards, Raleigh, N. C. [Editor’s Note: Dorr’s nomination as Under Secretary of Rural Development was opposed by Harkin. Dorr is from Marcus.)(8/27/2003)

… “Edwards vows to fight powergrid improvement rush” – headline from yesterday’s Union Leader. Dean wraps up New Hampshire bus tour with a commitment to protect public health during effort to expand power plant modernization. Excerpt from report – datelined Concord – by AP’s Holly Ramer: “Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards said Monday he will fight to protect public health as the Environmental Protection Agency prepares to allow some power plants to modernize without adding more pollution controls. Speaking at a diner crowded with breakfast customers, Edwards accused the Bush administration of taking the life out of the 1977 Clean Air Act by supporting a new rule the EPA is expected to issue this week. The rule relaxes the agency's definition of ‘routine maintenance,’ a catch-phrase describing the only reason an industry could modernize without having to install best-available pollution control technology. The Bush administration and industry officials characterize the changes as clarifications of a confusing standard and say the new rules would encourage emissions reductions by giving utilities new flexibility. But Edwards and other critics say the change will allow coal-burning plants and other facilities to release millions of tons of additional pollution into the air. ‘The least you can do is have somebody, the NIH or CDC, look at what effect it's going to have on public health,’ Edwards said, referring to the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ‘I think they refused to do it because they know what the answer would be.’ Earlier this year, Edwards co-sponsored an attempt to delay the rule so experts could study how the change would affect public health. That failed, but he said he will keep trying. ‘I'm going to attach this amendment to everything I can find,’ he said. The restaurant was the last stop the senator from North Carolina made in his six-day bus tour of the state.”(8/27/2003)

… “Edwards: Best for control of Congress” – headline from the News & Observer of Raleigh. Edwards contends he’d lead Dems back to congressional success – but doesn’t name other wannabes that Dem candidates might not want campaigning for them in ’04. Excerpt from report by the N&O’s John Wagner: U.S. Sen. John Edwards argued Tuesday that Democrats are most likely to make gains in the U.S. House and Senate in 2004 if he is the party's presidential nominee. During an appearance at the University of South Carolina Law Center, Edwards said congressional candidates in all parts of the country would want him to campaign for them during the general election -- which may not be the case with some of Democratic rivals. He did not mention any other candidates by name. ‘Democrats need to not only take back the White House but also the House and Senate,’ Edwards told a crowd of about 200 people, many of whom were law students. In response to a question, Edwards also relayed his plan to create panels to pre-screen medical malpractice lawsuits and to hold lawyers financially responsible if they file frivolous cases. ‘Those of us in the legal profession, we carry a responsibility,’ Edwards said. The gathering was the second in a series of town-hall-style meetings Edwards held in South Carolina, an early presidential primary state, on Monday and Tuesday. The final meeting was late Tuesday afternoon in Greenville, S.C.”(8/29/2003)

… “Edwards blasts Bush at town meeting…Democratic hopeful says president lacks compassion for ordinary citizens.” – headline from Wednesday’s The State in Columbia, SC. Excerpt from report by The State’s veteran political reporter Lee Bandy: “Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards unleashed a blistering attack Tuesday on President Bush, saying he lacks compassion for ordinary citizens and is too arrogant to seek international help in war-torn Iraq. During a town-hall meeting at the USC School of Law, the Seneca native also said Bush's economic policies built around tax cuts are bankrupting the country. ‘I thought when President Bush's father was president, things couldn't get much worse; this fellow is making his father look pretty good,’ Edwards, 50, told a standing-room-only crowd of 200, mostly law school students, jammed into a lecture room…Edwards, a U.S. senator from North Carolina, spoke for about 20 minutes and then fielded questions from the audience for nearly an hour. ‘This president does not come from the same place that most of us come from, and as a result, he does not view the things the way most of us do,’ Edwards said. ‘If I were to describe what I think is the fundamental difference between George Bush and most of us, it's really pretty simple. What he honors and respects is really one thing, and one thing only -- wealth.’ State Republican Chairman Katon Dawson said Edwards does not tell his audiences his plan for creating jobs calls for a tax increase. ‘Call me crazy, but I don't think taking several hundred dollars out of the wallets of hard-working moms and dads is the best way to get our economy growing,’ Dawson said. Edwards delivered his basic stump speech with a few new twists. He repeatedly attacked Bush's trade policies, blaming them for the loss of 3 million U.S. jobs. He mentioned South Carolina's 7 percent jobless rate, the highest in nine years, and laid the blame squarely at Bush's feet. ‘It's devastating, and this president is not going to do anything about it,’ Edwards said. The loss of jobs in South Carolina and closing of textile plants due to rising foreign competition are starting to cause voters to question Bush's economic policies, a development that could portend trouble for the president even in a Republican-leaning state like South Carolina. Edwards ridiculed a recent White House statement characterizing the current situation as a ‘jobless economic recovery.’…’I don't know where the president grew up, but where I come from, there is no such thing as an economic recovery without jobs,’ he said. ‘The best way for us to have real economic recovery is to make sure George Bush gets another job in 2004.’”(8/29/2003)

Des Moines Register political ace David Yepsen warns Kerry might not withstand a Dean win in Iowa, says it may be time for Edwards and Graham to get “gut checks” and notes that it’s “getting pretty late” for Clark to join the fun. Excerpt from column on CNN.com by “Inside Politics” anchor Judy Woodruff: “David Yepsen, veteran Des Moines Register reporter and political watcher, appearing on Friday's CNN's ‘Inside Politics,’ told me that he sees Dean building a slight lead over GephardtYepsen believes a Dean win in Iowa could prove costly to another rival, Kerry, down the road. ‘The candidate who wins Iowa automatically gets a 8- to 10-point bump in the state of New Hampshire, where Dean is already leading Kerry by, in some polls, double-digit margins,’ he said. ‘So I don't know that Kerry could withstand Dean winning here because it would just have a real multiplier effect in New Hampshire.’  Yepsen also said that Sens. Bob Graham, D-Florida, and John Edwards, D-North Carolina, might be due for a ‘gut check’ after spending considerable time and resources in the state, but failing to register any movement the polls…And what about a possible tenth member for the '04 Democratic field? Yepsen says it's still possible for former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Wesley Clark, who is weighing a run, to throw his hat in the ring. ‘Fifteen percent say they're undecided, so there's room for General Clark to get an audience, but it's getting pretty late.’ In a sign that some Democrats can't let go of the regular fall campaign marker, Kerry and Edwards scheduled official campaign ‘announcements’ for September 2 and September 16 respectively. Some political traditions never die.” (8/31/2003)

Edwards main page

Edwards Aug. 1-15, 2003

top of page

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine