John Kerry political cartoon.
Red and Blue Media
by Roger Wm. Hughes,
chairman
of Iowa Presidential Watch PAC
There has been a self-absorbed media examination of whether "media
objectivity" is leaving the landscape of American journalism. The
answer is yes.
Clearly, there are two American media -- one for the liberals and one
for the conservatives. Nothing has brought that home to me more than
the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Here is a group of individuals that
couldn’t get anyone to pay attention to them. So, what did they do?
They followed the example Michael Moore and wrote a book, "Unfit for
Command." They also produced an ad.
Now, the Boston Globe and Washington Post started a story yesterday on
Larry Thurlow and how he received a Bronze Star in the same incident
for which he is criticizing Sen. John Kerry’s receiving his medal. The
citation states that Thurlow received the Bronze Star in part for
being under automatic and small arms fire. This, the Boston Globe and
Washington Post states, proves Kerry is telling the truth and the
Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are lying. Kerry’s campaign even cited
it as proof of Kerry’s veracity.
Hence, these newspaper articles were the setup piece for Kerry to
"turn his boat into those who were firing at him," metaphorically
speaking.
The other great onslaught of the Blue Media centers around the fact
that a lot of Swiftees are from Texas. There they have friends who
know President Bush and the Bush family. They even have found a
‘godfather’ -- William Perry -- to give them $100,000 who is friends
with Karl Rove, and yes, some of them know Karl Rove as well. It is
interesting that the Blue Media doesn’t say that the Swiftees should
have obtained their money from Barbara Streisand.
Of course, this is proof that the scurrilous White House is lying and
planned for these veterans to frag Kerry.
So, why has objective journalism gone out the window? Because there
are things that journalist could be doing other than offering up a
graphic of which members of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth have
ever known or met a Bush or his supporters.
One thing that could be done is for Kerry to sign the Standard Form
180 and release his service medical records instead of offering up
pieces that do nothing to prove that he had serious wounds and
deserves his purple hearts.
Another thing that would go to proving whether Kerry and his small
band is telling the truth (or the other side with over 250 former
swift boat veterans) is to follow the paper work of how Kerry received
a Purple Heart… when no in the chain of command says that they
recommended him for it.
Another paper work trail would be to follow the awarding of Bronze
Stars to Kerry and Thurlow. Thurlow states that it sounds like one of
Kerry’s works of fiction, and he doesn’t know how the citation giving
him a Bronze Star ever came to say that there was gunfire. He swears
there wasn’t gunfire.
Another simply decent thing to do would be to ask the individuals who
are now against Kerry why they stood up for Kerry in the past. What
made them change their minds? This seems to be a common standard of
objective journalism to follow before saying in the Boston Globe or
the Washington Post that the person has no credibility because he
switched sides. If that was the standard, then Kerry shouldn’t even be
running for President, given how many times he has switched sides.
The prediction is that this will not get any better. In fact, it will
only get worse.